Blog EntryPortfolioMay 8, '07 6:00 AM
for everyone
This multiply I use as my portfolio,
I want to show to people the potrait of my journey, so far I still take the Jakarta Picture and I hope that someday I can take a picture outside Jakarta or maybe I can take a picture outside Indonesia I hope.

My interest in photography is a Human Interest and Landscape. I prefer not to use a lot of digital processing on my picture, usually I only use digital processing to control sharpness, contrass, and colour tone. And to change colour picture to black and white picture or with sephia effect

For camera, I prefer canon, now i'm using Canon 350 D, this is great camera for me, this camera give me and good image quality, and vary good in low light condition because the CMOS sensor that Canon have. Sharpness and noise control work well and have a great colour tone. I read some review for this camera, and many review said this is high recomended for entry DSLR.
 
And for my lenses I have Canon Lens 18-55mm F3.5-5.6 EF-S, Canon Lens 90-300mm F4.6-5.6 non USM, Sigma Lens 28-105mm F3.8-5.6 IF Aspherical UC-III, and Tamron Lens 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Aspherical IF [XR] Macro.
What I like from my Tamron is Tamron give me a sharp result for my picture, and good contrast, it's very good for all around lens. But the minus from this lens are this lens is not suitable to take a picture in low light condition, so I must use high ISO to avoid a vibration or camera shake and the effect from using high ISO the noise on your picture will come out.

From Sigma Lens what I like with this lens give a soft picture it's ideal for take a potrait. but this lens do not give me a good result when I use it in low light condition same like Tamron. Many people said that lens kit for Canon 350 D  (18-55mm F3.5-5.6  EF-S) is not a good lens, what I think is not like that, this lens give a good result even in low llight condition, I use this lens many time to take still live picture and give a good BOKEH (the blurr background image for potrait) especially in wide aperture and good DOF (Depth Of Field). and for landscape I use this lens to take night shoot picture, and give a good result toofor me. but the minus from this lens is not as sharp as Tamron Lens, but we can make sharpen with digital processing for example to make sharp from the picture that I take from my Canon Lens (18-55mm F3.5-5.6 EF-S) I'm using Adobe Photoshop CS 3 to do digital image processing, with this software I can fix my picture and make a great picture.

My Canon 90-300mm F4.6-5.6 non USM work well for me but a little bit soft in 300mm, I used this lens oftenly, before I buy Tamron 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Aspherical IF [XR] Macro. Canon 90-300mm F4.6-5.6 non USM is not a fast lens  but more quite rather than my Tamron.




budkarbitan wrote on Jul 25, '07
kebetulan lagi nyari lensa yang tele nih skarang
ada saran gk
antara
Tamron AF 70-300mm Di F4-5.6 LD Macro
sama
Canon Lens EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 III USM
sama
Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO Macro Super

yang mana yang lebih bagus dari tajem, warna, DLL lah
kan situ lebih tw tuh, dari pengalamannya
info aja gw pake 400d, lbih 50 yah dari kamera lo
hiiiihihihihi


mw tanya sekalian antara
Sigma Lens 28-105mm F3.8-5.6 IF Aspherical UC-III, and Tamron Lens 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Aspherical IF [XR] Macro.
itukan hampir sama focal leng nya
kenapa ada 2 gtu
kan si tamron dah mencakup si sigmanya
apalagi si tamron dah makro lagi tuh
rangga12 wrote on Oct 8, '07
kebetulan lagi nyari lensa yang tele nih skarang
ada saran gk
antara
Tamron AF 70-300mm Di F4-5.6 LD Macro
sama
Canon Lens EF 75-300mm F4-5.6 III USM
sama
Sigma 70-300mm F4-5.6 APO Macro Super

yang mana yang lebih bagus dari tajem, warna, DLL lah
kan situ lebih tw tuh, dari pengalamannya
info aja gw pake 400d, lbih 50 yah dari kamera lo
hiiiihihihihi


mw tanya sekalian antara
Sigma Lens 28-105mm F3.8-5.6 IF Aspherical UC-III, and Tamron Lens 28-200mm F3.8-5.6 Aspherical IF [XR] Macro.
itukan hampir sama focal leng nya
kenapa ada 2 gtu
kan si tamron dah mencakup si sigmanya
apalagi si tamron dah makro lagi tuh
kalo sekedar saran mengenai tele kayaknya udah main selera,
gini aja,

kalo pilih mainstream, warna pasti bagus, tapi kalo mainstreamnya yang 75-30 III USM
itu nggak begitu tajam apalagi pada bukaan 300mm itu udah nggak tajem dibanding sama tamron dan sigma. kalo tamron telenya bagus tapi untuk makronya lebih begus hasilnya sigma

kesimpulannya:
canon ; warna ok, tapi kurang tajem dan tidak ada makronya
tamron; tajem tapi makronya kurang
sigma; tajem, makronya bagus tapi warnanya nggak bisa nyaingin canon

nah sekarang tinggal pilih mana yang lebih dibutuhkan
maaf kalo sarannya kurang bekenan

o iya kalo yang antara sigma 28-105 dan tamron 28-200 itu emang hampir sama
tapi kalo sigma bagus kalo dipake untuk potrait yang agak soft nah wanrnya pas tuh menurut selera gue

dan tamron gue, gue pake untuk all arround yang mencakup semuanya

emang rada boros hehehe

selamat beli tele ya

maaf baru bales :)
gitafriends wrote on Jul 8, edited on Jul 8
Hmm...gw baru liat nich blog ( tulisan loe ) menarik...terkahir nulis di blog kapan ngga? gak pengen nulis lagi...tapi focusnya lo emang di photo dan kamera dan teman-temanya ( lensa dsb)
Di blog ini ada satu statement lo yg bilang "I hope that someday I can take a picture outside Jakarta or maybe I can take a picture outside Indonesia I hope"
your wish comes true ngga...so keep on dreaming Ngga...next destination East Indonesia habis itu baru dech Africa selatan.

Sukses yach Ngga...

Add a Comment
   
© 2008 Multiply, Inc.    About · Blog · Terms · Privacy · Corp Info · Contact Us · Help